|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
417 days ago
|
|
The case didn't succeed in producing the records. But the process uncovered a lot of shit. But again, you're comparing non-disclosure to irresponsible disclosure. VdL didn't send highly sensitive scramble times to a rando. |
|
Is there evidence that SECDEF 'acted with criminal intent'?
We've already clarified that '[being] extremely careless' is not enough for a court case.
[I have a mental picture of a Venn diagram with three circles: "Politicians", "Idiots" and "Criminals"...]