| I'm reading a little between the lines here. But I think this is what her answers would be: > The people she knows who signed up were male, and that's unfortunate because? A lack of diversity is a fundamental evil. > Her female friends were not being di[s]couraged from signing up, were th[e]y? Females must equal males in all things. Otherwise it's DISCRIMINATION by the GRAND EVIL SEXIST PIG CONSPIRACY. > Would it be disappointing if most of her readers were female? No. A mostly-female community is empowering. A mostly-male community is a sexist boys' club. THIS RULE HOLDS REGARDLESS OF ALL FACTS, REASONS, AND MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES. > But then, it's also bad that there is a $50 cost to entry. CAPITALISM AND MAKING MONEY are evil under all circumstances. In the future, everyone will work for the government, and all will be sweetness and light. Despite the fact that this was tried and failed miserably, as anyone who knows anything about the past 100 years of world history can tell you. > I'd like it to be easier (dollar-free) to join a site I thought was the wrong direction in social? The world owes me a handout. Obviously. > If app.net is successful, what would prevent others from creating their own interest-driven sites? OH NOES MORE CAPITALISTS IT'S SPREADING |