|
|
|
|
|
by scudsworth
407 days ago
|
|
- Supporting Wikipedia’s moderators and patrollers with AI-assisted workflows that automate tedious tasks in support of knowledge integrity; so, a chatbot on top of some tooling probably - Giving Wikipedia’s editors time back by improving the discoverability of information on Wikipedia to leave more time for human deliberation, judgment, and consensus building; extremely vague, but probably the "train a specialized ai on our own corpus to answer questions about it" style bot helper? these make stuff up left and right too - Helping editors share local perspectives or context by automating the translation and adaptation of common topics; automated translations would be a big step in the wrong direction - Scaling the onboarding of new Wikipedia volunteers with guided mentorship. you can't do "mentorship" with ai in any real way. all in all seems a box checking exercise for their ML officer. |
|