[obitsten]

Fwiw there are umpteen anecdotes from men on the opposite side of this situation. You can imagine, even in a situation where the woman is the aggressor, the instinct and unofficial practice is to always arrest the man.

I'm a little puzzled, to be frank, to see one being handled this way. There are definitely two sides to this story.

[atmavatar]

I've occasionally heard references to a Duluth Model (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model) whereby the police will always arrest the male in any heterosexual domestic violence call, but I don't know how widely-used (if at all) it is to form any kind of opinion on the matter.

As a guy, I've already seen and experienced that no bystanders will bat an eye if a woman assaults me, and no one's going to take me seriously if I mention it after the fact, even (especially?) if I were to be injured. I have zero reason to believe the police will be any better, and in the US, they're not known for de-escalating situations, so calling them would never cross my mind anyway.

All that said, the article raises some red flags for me as well. We're only very briefly told that the author returns home from work, gets attacked by her ex-boyfriend, calls the police, and is arrested herself.

Why/how is the ex-boyfriend in her home? What precisely happened in the attack (e.g., the only detail we're given is a thrown, partially-full beer can)? What (if anything) precipitated the attack? Has there been violence between the two before?

It's quite possible the ex-boyfriend is completely at fault, she did nothing wrong, and additional detail would clear up my reservations, so I want to give the author the benefit of the doubt.

However, the tone of the rest of the piece also gives me pause, especially where she spends a bunch of time opining about the failures of the system while talking about cell mates who are obviously (and in one case, admittedly) guilty of that for which they are currently incarcerated. Bail reform is a perfectly valid issue to discuss, but juxtaposing the cellmates' bail woes against the original story only suggests the author identifies with their guilt. Perhaps that's merely poor storytelling.

[WarOnPrivacy]

> I'm a little puzzled, to be frank, to see one being handled this way. There are definitely two sides to this story.

You shouldn't be. I've seen low-experience cops get soundly manipulated over and over and over. As long as a manipulative abuser gets that cop's ear first, that cop is handled.

For those times when the cop learns they'd been had - once the facts are now clear, they do not arrest the manipulator or even try to do the right thing. Not ever.

They get in their cars and go, leaving a rewarded abuser behind.

Throw in a law that mandates an arrest and they're going to arrest the person who has the least capability to embarrass them (further).

[analog31]

Throw in a law that mandates an arrest, and they're going to arrest the most innocent person, just to avoid further involvement.