[ryanac]

"You have made the choice not to enforce your own terms of service."

Not really. They've just made a choice not to enforce Section 11, which they state, in Section 11, that they can do.

In the first sentence of Section 11 it says "in the sole judgment of CloudFlare", doesn't that mean that they get to make the choice of whether or not a site violates anything in Section 11?

Are there any lawsuits from any government or official channel that successfully went after WikiLeaks for violations that CloudFlare needs to comply with?

In this case I think it's for CloudFlare to decide, they state this in Section 11 and they've made their choice.

[dsl]

My point is they are aware of what Wikileaks is, and they are making a conscious decision to not enforce the terms (which is as you point out, at their discretion).

Regardless of your feelings on the matter, Wikileaks does admit they do not have the permission of the rights holders to be releasing documents.

[true_religion]

It's interesting to note that Wikileaks hasn't ever been served with a DMCA or anything similar.