|
|
|
|
|
by bluefirebrand
409 days ago
|
|
> As far as goalpost-moving goes, it's wild to me that nobody is talking about the turing test these days To be honest I am still not entirely convinced that current LLMs pass the turing test consistently, at least not with any reasonably skeptical tester "Reasonably Skeptical Tester" is a bit of goalpost shifting, but... Let's be real here. Most of these LLMs have way too much of a "customer service voice", it's not very conversational and I think it is fairly easy to identify, especially if you suspect they are an LLM and start to probe their behavior Frankly, if the bar for passing the Turing Test is "it must fool some number of low intelligence gullible people" then we've had AI for decades, since people have been falling for scammy porno bots for a long time |
|
And the "customer service voice" you see is one that is intentionally programmed in by the vendors via baseline rules. They can be programmed differently--or overridden by appropriate prompts--to have a very different tone.
LLMs trained on trillions of human-generated text fragments available from the internet have shown that the TT is simply not an adequate test for identifying whether a machine is "thinking"--which was Turing's original intent in his 1950 paper "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" in which he introduced the test (which he called "the imitation game").