|
|
|
|
|
by sgarland
408 days ago
|
|
> With UUIDs there is absolutely no need for that. Except now (assuming it’s the PK) you’ve added the additional overhead of a UUID PK, which depending on the version and your RDBMS vendor, can be massive. If it’s a non-prime column, I have far fewer issues with them. > The data is not ephemeral of course. I may be misunderstanding, but if it isn’t persisted to disk (which generally means a DB), then it should not be seen as durable. |
|
Yes the overhead of UUIDs was something I mentioned already. For us it absolutely makes sense to use them, we don't anticipate to have hundreds of millions of records in our tables.