|
|
|
|
|
by paulcole
413 days ago
|
|
> I'll trust in your capacity to resolve any concerns with what I wrote. Yes, that is what I would do as well if I didn't want to answer a clear question. > But yes, it is spam. So then you retract this, "The only requirements are that it be mass (some define that as > 1 target) and unsolicited." because the only requirement is that the recipient see it as spam? |
|