[mitthrowaway2]

I'm not sure that it says what you think it says. It seems to equally apply to the trustworthiness of people like Rosa Parks.

[bobalob]

How so? Are you suggesting that the civil rights of males are being violated when they're told that female-only spaces are off-limits?

[mitthrowaway2]

I'm merely following the logic of your argument, that people who violate rules demonstrate untrustworthiness and a lack of respect for boundaries; you did not specify an exception for those people whose civil rights are being infringed by those rules.

Are you saying that it's fair to extend such an exception?

[bobalob]

You're taking part of my comment and ignoring the context in which it was written.

[thomasfedb]

I think you should expect to have your arguments deconstructed on HN.

[bobalob]

To do that requires addressing the actual argument.