|
|
|
|
|
by kstrauser
411 days ago
|
|
In general, people who license something as GPLv3 probably consider that a feature, not a bug. I mentioned here recently that I released a personal project under the GPLv3. The very first issue someone filed in GitHub was to ask me to relicense it as something more business friendly. I don't think I've been so offended by an issue before. If I'm writing something for fun, I could not possibly be less interested in helping else someone monetize my work. They can play by Free Software rules, or they can write their own version for themselves and license it however they want. I don't owe them the freedom to make it un-Free. The fact that this is hosted on a FSF-managed service indicates the author likely sees it similarly. |
|