|
|
|
|
|
by s1artibartfast
413 days ago
|
|
Im talking about intent: knowingly and intentionally breaking the law. I understand that honest mistakes happen due to inaccurate information, understand, ect. - e.g. you thought a cop was a burglar. These are different from poor and regrettable choices, also sometimes referred to as "mistakes". - I beat my wife because I caught them cheating.
There may be an interpretation of this situation where judge did not understand their situation and actions, but I don't find it very probable. It seems clear that they were trying to help the target of a legal warrant evade law enforcement apprehension, and knew exactly what they were doing. |
|
1) I walked in. An argument and a fight ensued.
2) I found out about it, went of and thought, and made the choice.
There's a hierarchy, including:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provocation_(law) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense
I find it entirely probable that the judge didn't know or understand, in the moment, their situation and the implications of their actions. Indeed, I will go one step further. If ICE does illegal things 100 times, then it's reasonable to expect an unreasonable reaction maybe 10% of the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximate_cause
If I were a judge, and someone came into court with an "administrative warrant," I might not want them disturbing my courthouse either. I might want parties to feel safe there, and be concerned about miscarriages of justice if parties are scared to show up.