|
|
|
|
|
by hnlmorg
419 days ago
|
|
You’re questions are already answered in the article: 1. The items were on display in this bedroom 2. The quantities were so small that they were deemed safe to eat. This sounds like more of a case of the border force wanting to raise awareness rather than any actual danger being presented |
|
I read some more about it (Guardian) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/apr/11/scien... and entirely agree with you that the border force over-reacted, and could have spent the money and resources more effectively than by pursuing this.
Also, via Guardian, this attitude is demeaning and depressing:
>"At a sentence hearing in March, the lawyer described Lidden as a “science nerd” who committed the offences out of pure naivety. “It was a manifestation of self-soothing retreating into collection; it could have been anything but in this case he latched on to the collection of the periodic table,”