[pzduniak]

How are folks interpreting "include (advanced features) in the NATS server while exploring a BSL license model for future versions" given the statement that "We never considered blanket relicensing of the codebase"? It sounds like grasping at semantics to paint themselves in more positive light. I still very much read this as a server code relicense of a project that they transferred to CNCF.

[Pet_Ant]

I hate the rhetoric that BuSL is not open-source. It’s not currently open source, but in’s irrevocably escrowed to be open source in a few to a dozens to months and you can read it now.