|
|
|
|
|
by underseacables
423 days ago
|
|
This seems lite on facts. Even if I wanted to arrest a sitting judge, it would have to be an act of gross malfeasance to motivate me to even consider arrest. The only thing I can think of… Is, if the judge swore under oath, affidavit, or something like that, that she did not do something when in fact that she did. But even then… If Patel does not come back with some thing on that level or better, then this was a horrible farce. |
|
This logic projects rationality onto an administration that does not merit such assumptions.