[glesica]

What you just cited isn't a progressive income tax, it's a flat tax. Twice as much income -> twice as much tax. So we both pay, say 0.01% of our income for the haircut. So are you saying that even a flat tax is unacceptable?

As to your point about people getting government services without paying, the chief reason for that is that if we demanded that everyone pay we'd either end up giving their money back to them or letting them starve in the street. So they just get to keep it, which is easier to administer.

And no, no one owes you a big "thank you so much" for paying taxes. Your "thank you" comes in the form of that big paycheck you got thanks, in part, to the government and the society creating an atmosphere in which success can be rewarded.

It has been pointed out before that if you are truly looking for a libertarian country, you should move to Somalia. How much money do you think you could may there?

[gyardley]

Read my comment again, where I said "I'm not saying a progressive income tax isn't necessary..."

How do you get "are you saying that even a flat tax is unacceptable?" out of that, given that I said exactly the opposite?

The issue is entirely with the word 'fair' and the rhetoric around 'fair share'. Progressive income taxes are not remotely fair by any sane definition of the word, whether they're necessary or not.