> of paying $2 to $3 more on a $100 item, not paying $110 more on a $100 item
$110 more on a $100 item would be $210. I have no idea where pwg got the “$110 more”, though. Seems the in-context comparison would be “$85 more”.
> of paying $2 to $3 more on a $100 item, not paying $110 more on a $100 item
$110 more on a $100 item would be $210. I have no idea where pwg got the “$110 more”, though. Seems the in-context comparison would be “$85 more”.