This is something that has never happened before.
When you need open source for promotion and fundraising, you embrace open source; when you want to make money, you kick open source to the curb.
That's what we see.
Synadia was clearly open to being supported by community contributions. But since no-one who used NATS wanted to maintain NATS, a decision has to be made about how to support the project in the long-term.
Either this “somehow” comes from the community or it comes from the investors. If it’s the latter then eventually the pull is more towards revenue.