[tomhow]

Dang has written about this at length several times over the years and did so again just three days ago:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

We don't manually intervene to deemphasise content just because it's political, and indeed we often manually intervene to restore political stories to the front page when they have been automatically downweighted due to flags or flamewars.

We moderate to optimize for intellectual curiosity, nothing more.

[mdhb]

It’s an awfully convenient bit of wording where nobody can pin you down on exactly what that means but only on what actions get taken.

It’s what I’m referring to when I say that I’ve never once seen a moderator once consider their own judgement when presented with feedback. It’s always the same line. Things are running exactly as intended from your point of view it would seem.

[tomhow]

I mean not to be difficult: just to try and understand exactly what your claim is.

If you have an example of a moderation action that you disagreed with (E.g., a particular story about DOGE or the administration that wasn't adequately discussed on HN), please share a link or something else concrete and we'll explain it or investigate it. You can post it here or email us (we have had email threads going back years with users who want to share feedback and learn about how we think about these things [1]).

There are plenty of ways of examining the data:

- https://github.com/HackerNews/API

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40644563

- https://hn.algolia.com/

- https://news.ycombinator.com/front

If you have concerns about any future stories being hidden, you could set up your own API listener, monitor for new stories and then see which ones are flagged or killed.

For the record, I routinely undertake practices for evaluating and improving my own judgement, and am happy to do so regarding any specific case. But you haven't provided me with any specific feedback to respond to.

[1] https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-silicon-valley/th...

[jamincan]

At the peak period of DOGE activity when it was the biggest political news story, I never once saw stories about it on the front page here. Someone relying on HN as their primary news aggregator would be entirely clueless to what was going on in Washington. I actually tried searching for them at last, because it seemed implausible to me that nothing was being posted and gaining traction and it was only then that I realized that there were tonnes of stories, but they were being flagged and buried.

I don't necessarily know that it's moderator malfeascence so much as people abusing HN tools to bury stories that they don't like, but I do think that there should be some consideration about how those tools are being abused and how that abuse can be effectively countered.

I get the impression that an effort is being made to correct the situation, but I've given up on the front page and only visit /active now, so I might be completely wrong.

[tomhow]

Guys, I want to investigate this claim, but people keep making it without giving me any details to look into. If you give us a specific news item or date range, we can look at the data and see what was happening (we have access to internal and external tools that show where each story was ranked at different times).

Also: any time you know of an important story that you think should be on the front page, you can email us to let us know - [e-mail]. We'll either address it or explain why we're doing something other than what you're asking for.

> Someone relying on HN as their primary news aggregator

Who are these people who look only at HN and nothing else, expecting to be fully informed about everything that's important in the world? :)