|
|
|
|
|
by caconym_
431 days ago
|
|
> Aren't humans themselves essentially human made? No, not in the sense in which the word "made" is being used here. > Maybe a better definition would be non-human (or inorganic if we want to include intelligence like e.g. dolphins)? Neither of these work. Calling intelligence in animals "artificial" is absurd, and "inorganic" arbitrarily excludes "head cheese" style approaches to building artificial intelligence. "Artificial" strongly implies mimicry of something that occurs naturally, and is derived from the same root as "artifice", which can be defined as "to construct by means of skill or specialized art". This obviously excludes the natural biological act of reproduction that produces a newborn human brain (and support equipment) primed to learn and grow; reportedly, sometimes people don't even know they're pregnant until they go into labor (and figure out that's what's happening). |
|