Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ncruces 421 days ago
Looking at the diagram for the SQLite VFS page I didn't think I was going overboard with designing my driver around 3 packages: https://sqlite.org/vfs.html

One layer wraps SQLite C API, below it lives a pure Go VFS, and above all that database/sql driver.

Even this coarse split (with a collection internal packages, the bigger one of them “utils”) is enough to need various band-aids to accommodate the impossibility of circular dependencies.

I honestly don't think it helps much.

At the module level, there are obvious benefits from the impossibility. Just like all the pain around v2 modules can be justified, even if I find it annoying.

When packages are also the only layer at which you can enforce visibility, it becomes worse.

1 comments

See the last case of how to handle circular dependencies.

Ports are special cases. Always are.