|
|
|
|
|
by jacques_chester
5054 days ago
|
|
Looking at my post again, I guess I didn't do a very good job. I didn't mean 2.5Mb per copy of the JVM. I meant per runtime within the JVM. These are run as threads, rather than processes. So we're really comparing n instances of MRI * 50Mb
vs 1 JVM + (n * 2.5Mb)
Where the cost of the JVM itself is amortised over the application instances.Sorry, what I said originally is easily misleading. |
|