[stevenAthompson]

Fifty four percent of Americans read below the sixth grade level. All effective PSA's must primarily target people who don't understand the world around them, and likely never will.

It's not condescending, because it's not targeted to you.

[robocat]

You are implying that people don't understand the world if their reading level is low?

Maybe your literacy level is high, but perhaps your level of understanding people could be higher.

[stevenAthompson]

> You are implying that people don't understand the world if their reading level is low?

I'm not implying anything. I am directly stating that people who can't read well do not, and can not, understand the modern world.

For example, how would someone that reads below the sixth grade level understand the tariff situation, Artificial Intelligence, or Cryptocurrency? Can they make good healthcare decisions, or manage a 401k properly? Can they choose an elected representative who has their best interests, and the interests of our nation in mind? I think not, and furthermore, they will spend their lives as financial prey animals to those who are more capable.

Do you seriously believe something different? Maybe I'm missing something obvious.

[wizzwizz4]

If your attitude to learning is wrong in a particular way, then reading will only make you more steadfast in your beliefs.

[stevenAthompson]

I know what all of these words mean, but not in this particular order.

How does reading make you more steadfast in having a "wrong" attitude toward learning?

[wizzwizz4]

If your attitude towards learning is "learning why I'm right", rather than "learning what is true", then you will tend to discard information that conflicts with your preconceptions, and distort all other information into supporting them. Most people do this to some degree, but some people elevate it to an art form.

[mapontosevenths]

Sure, it's easy to fall into a trap where accepting new information is hard, and I think most adults are aware that as we age it's important to try and keep an open mind. However, our society currently has an even bigger problem with people who do the opposite. People were taught to "keep an open mind", but haven't been taught what a good source is.

Like everything, you have to find a balance wherein you can accept new information but are choosy about the sources of that info. Otherwise bad data and hidden agendas will have you avoiding basic healthcare because vaccines give you autistic 5g and drinking bleach to kill the imaginary parasites makes more sense than smearing a little cortisone cream on.

A great man once said: "We do our peers, countrymen, students, and children a grave disservice by admonishing them to think for themselves without also giving them the critical thinking tools to do so, for in so doing we foster a culture where "independent thought" is equated with "contrarian thought". This gives rise to an anti-intellectual, anti-science paradigm that supports an idea not because it meets a basic standard of evidence, but rather simply because it opposes established thought. This is worse than the intellectual calcification that stagnant "herd thinking" would give rise to, because it doesn't simply halt progress — it puts it in full retreat."