[behnamoh]

> ... lua is a game changer...

Am I the only one who absolutely hates Lua? Its syntax, the fact that variables are global by default unless you local them, `foo = nil` isn't variable assignment but instead variable unassignment!, etc.

There are far better scripting languages than Lua.

[ajross]

You are absolutely not. In point of fact pretty much everyone hates Lua except the handful of folks integrating it. It has a huge lead in terms of embeddability and performance vs. competitors like Python. So you see it show up in little C applications[1] again and again and again because everything else is just too much of a hassle.

But everyone agrees the programming experience in the language is awful.

[1] My son just got into RC planes, so of course I found myself looking at ExpressLRS radios and pulling EdgeTX from GitHub. It's an otherwise straightforward ESP32 board, and there in the app... yup, Lua everywhere.

[JSR_FDED]

> But everyone agrees the programming experience in the language is awful.

Simply not true. The power to weight ratio of Lua is amazing. You can keep the entire language in your head easily, and even without LuaJIT it’s crazy fast. It’s great for creating DSLs. As a configuration language it is excellent- in fact that’s how Lua originally came to exist.

[ajross]

DSLs and configuration languages aren't "programming experience" though. (Also that's oversold, you should be on a lisp if that's the design goal, Lua is a distant second.)

I stand by what I said. Lua sucks for coding. The only people who like it are ones who haven't mastered one of the "real" environments.

[kzrdude]

well, you could warm up to it by using vimscript first

[ykonstant]

vim9script is much more approachable while still being native to Vim's internals and idea of text editing. I don't know about using it for things like LSPs though, perhaps an expert could chime in.

[lawn]

It's true that Lua is very rough in many places.

But it's still ten times better than Vimscript.