[feraloink]

IANAL so I'm likely missing something, but I don't understand why the person representing Google said they had won half the case, given that:

>Google violated the Sherman Act by monopolizing and unlawfully tying two parts of the ad tech stack together, specifically DFP and AdX, and that Google is guilty of abuse of monopoly power in publisher-side adtech

AND

>In a separate antitrust case, another federal judge last year found that Google illegally monopolized the general internet search market.

Also, I think the article said that the judge for this most recent case, the Sherman Act violations, would discuss remedies on Thursday. But today is Thursday. Do you think they meant next week?