And of course the definition of terrorist is will vary based on what politicians want. US recently sent some "Terrorists" to a gulag for example.
Nope, it's about exactly that. This policy would work only for law-abiding citizens which terrorists are not, that's the point.
Added: The current gulag expeditions in US nor Guantanamo have nothing to do with US citizens, which is a big difference from GGP's comment.
Nope, it's about exactly that. This policy would work only for law-abiding citizens which terrorists are not, that's the point.
Added: The current gulag expeditions in US nor Guantanamo have nothing to do with US citizens, which is a big difference from GGP's comment.