|
|
|
|
|
by carlkcarlk
428 days ago
|
|
Yes, the article figures that with a limit of 64GB of memory, with simple nested loops, you could only loop about 10^(165 billion) steps. To get 10^^15 steps, the article assumes "any amount of zero-initialized memory". (It calls that assumption "unrealistic but interesting".) |
|
If you are cloud-averse, you could do the same with networked storage on your local LAN and just connect more disks when it's running out.