|
|
|
|
|
by VyseofArcadia
431 days ago
|
|
> My point here is, I'd really hate to gatekeep software development to a small group of "licensed" engineers. If anything, I want the opposite--to enpower more people to make software for themselves, so they can make their computers work for them. (This is why I dislike iOS so much.) I 100% agree. I wouldn't want to gatekeep software development in general. I would only put the PE requirement on companies that are running a service connected to the internet that collects user data. Want to make an application that never phones home at all? Go nuts. Want to run a service that never collects any sensitive data? Sure thing! Want to run a service that needs sensitive data to function? Names, addresses, credit card info? Yeah, you're going to need a PE to sign off of that. Side note, I was a math teacher in a previous life. Congrats on the relatively new career, and thanks for your service. |
|
Agreed, but I do think a tool like curl makes this a little complicated. To my knowledge, curl itself does not phone home or collect user data, but it's obviously security critical.
...or maybe it's not, now that I think about it. Curl is not end-user software. Maybe when other software uses curl, that software gets a PE sign off. But now this is starting to feel to me like another dumb compliance checkbox system. Is it?