[jerf]

It's not a literal point, it's an observation of how far we've come. A single texture blows away 2600 and NES games in size quite handily. The emulation effort for either is a sneeze compared to what we pour into a single frame nowadays. Compared to modern stuff they're both just primitive beyond primitive as far as a modern kid is concerned.

And as for your second paragraph, it has that thing I don't understand that so many people seem to have in their brains that if you explain why a thing is true, it is no longer true. I do not understand it. Explaining why they haven't moved on does not suddenly make it so they have moved on. They haven't moved on. Best of luck to them but I doubt it's going to work very well as a strategy in 2025 any more than it did in the 1980s.

[anthk]

Even in early and late 00's, NES, SNES and MD games were emulated everywhere.

[HFguy]

"And as for your second paragraph, it has that thing I don't understand that so many people seem to have in their brains that if you explain why a thing is true, it is no longer true. I do not understand it."

This is an interesting observation. I've seen the same thing.

I think the clue is in the "it is a choice"...perhaps they are perceiving seeing some sort of judgement being made of Atari implicit in your argument???

In other words, it can be true at the same time that (1) The are not moving on and (2) It is a choice.

And #2 does not invalidate #1.

[MYEUHD]

What is a "modern kid"? :) Super Mario Bros. 3 is very enjoyable, even for a "modern kid"

[kjkjadksj]

Dude. There is no way in hell they probably even could move on. They probably simply do not have the organizational structure to develop modern games. They are like one of those companies making retro style record players. That is their niche. Not trying to go toe to toe with nintendo or playstation. Just a completely different business model.