Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DrCatbox 5058 days ago
Am I the only one thats afraid of a fuckup happening and the rover becoming bricked before it actually moved!?
2 comments

I'm fairly sure that completely separating system boot functionality and software reprogramming functionality was one of the first requirements of the rover software update subsystem!

Sticking the bootloader in a ROM is a fairly secure way to accomplish this.

I'm pretty sure they have a duplicate hardware setup for testing beforehand and debugging problems, which ought to help avoid such problems, and help fixing problems that arise.