|
|
|
|
|
by timewizard
426 days ago
|
|
> "and it has accelerated my output massively." The folly of single ended metrics. > but to avoid LLMs out of principal? That's just luddite. Do you double check that the LLM hasn't magically recreated someone else's copyrighted code? That's just irresponsible in certain contexts. > in case you feel it relevant. Of course it's relevant. If a 19 year old with 1 year of driving experience tries to sell me a car using their personal anecdote as a metric I'd be suspicious. If their only salient point is that "it gets me to where I'm going faster!" I'd be doubly suspicious. |
|
I frankly do not care, and I expect LLMs to become such ubiquitous table-stakes that I don't think anyone will really care in the long run.