[eqvinox]

That's good to know, but —assuming my sample of size 1 isn't a bad outlier, I should really try a few more— there's another problem: I don't think we'd be willing to sink time into tuning a currently-free subscription service that can be yanked at any time. And I'm in a position to say it is highly unlikely that we'd pay for the service.

(We already have problems with our human review being too superficial; we've recently come to a consensus that we're letting too much technical debt slip in, in the sense of unnoticed design problems.)

Now the funny part is that I'm talking about a FOSS project with nVidia involvement ;D

But also: this being a FOSS project, people have opened AI-generated PRs. Poor AI-generated PRs. This is indirectly hurting the prospects of your product (by reputation). Might I suggest adding an AI generated PR detector, if possible? (It's not in our guidelines yet but I expect we'll be prohibiting AI generated contributions soon.)

[allisonee]

totally get where you're coming from--many big open source repos have also been using it for a while and have seen some FP but have generally felt that the quality overall was worth it. would love to continue having you try it out, but also understand that maintaining a FOSS project is a ton of work!

if you have specific feedback on the pr--feel free to email at [e-mail] and i'll take a look personally and see if we can adjust anything for your repo.

nice idea on the fully AI-generated PRs! something in our roadmap is to better highlight PRs or chunks that were likely auto-gened. stay tuned !