[jchw]

If you want to maintain the properties that SQLite has for read use cases, you'll need to replicate a couple of features. At the very least, you'll probably want the format to still be page-based with a BTree structure. You really could get away with just using the SQLite format if you didn't mind the weirdness; a functional SQLite parser that can read tables would not be a significant amount of code. I think, though, that if you want to read the schema as SQLite understands it, you'd need to interpret the CREATE TABLE syntax, which would make it a bit more complex for sure. Otherwise, you can read tables and columns themselves relatively easily, and the values are all stringified.

[hinkley]

Yeah if I wasn’t clear I’m talking about a minimal file that SQLite can still open read only without errors, not a third party implementation. Though there might be a few tweaks that would allow SQLite to be a bit more lenient. For instance missing metadata that can be assumed. Maybe b tree nodes exceeding the usual load factor.