[wruza]

It always bothered me that people go "ew, wikipedia" when you simply refer them to it rather than literally rewording the article (which they would accept, or at least reply with "source? source? s-s-source? so-source?" to which you could successfully post any source from the wiki article). Reference is not a proof, it's information that you have to check yourself if you want the latter. I guess same will happen with LLMs. Any link to a chat will be met by some with "ew, llm" regardless of the fact whether it's checked and informative and saves effort to formulate, or is just-generated crap. With all the issues with llms, it's us who don't understand the basics when it comes to handling the info. This is by semi-natural social design, I believe.