|
|
|
|
|
by windsignaling
435 days ago
|
|
This is interesting because it shows us how a programmer thinks of a problem vs. how a psychologist or neuroscientist would think of this problem and highlights the lack of "human-ness" in programmer thinking. I'm no fan of schools forcing STEM students to study boring electives but this is a prime example of why that might be useful. The entire premise of the post is wrong - average pixel value has nothing to do with how orange the oranges look - it's all about perception. Here's an example where the same exact color (pixel value) can be perceived as either light or dark depending on the context: http://brainden.com/images/identical-colors-big.jpg That's what the bag adds - context - but the author hasn't made this connection. |
|
To me it showed curiosity and ingenuity, sure they might not have studied a certain subject but it is a totally valid approach to an unknown problem. It might actually get people who have similar "silly questions" to run a similar set of experiment and perhaps stumble upon something novel.
You comment showed less human-ness than OP, ironically.