|
|
|
|
|
|
by walleeee
430 days ago
|
|
|
> The author is essentially arguing that fewer people will be able to build software in the future. Setting aside the fact that the author nowhere says this, it may in fact be plausible. > That's the opposite of what's happened over the past year or two. Now many more non-technical people can (and are) building software. Meanwhile half[0] the students supposed to be learning to build software in university will fail to learn something important because they asked Claude instead of thinking about it. (Or all the students using llms will fail to learn something half the time, etc.) [0]: https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-education-report-ho... > That said, nearly half (~47%) of student-AI conversations were Direct—that is, seeking answers or content with minimal engagement. |
|
|