[fbrchps]

This format is unreadable on mobile, it keeps opening up my keyboard and scrolling up a bit when it does.

I understand and appreciate the "why" of the format, but this also could have been a non-editable "editor-like" presentation and achieved the same result.

[eclipticplane]

This site's mobile experience mirrors my feelings when having to edit deeply nested and templated YAML.

[trallnag]

Is editing deeply nested JSON and XML a better experience than YAML? I don't think so.

[mcpeepants]

I’d argue yes, strictly due to the lack of significant whitespace.

[strunz]

That's a really odd reason to prefer something used as a configuration language where readability is important.

[zzlk]

From the bottom of the article:

> # ps. By design, this website is as usable as YAML.

It's intentionally bad.

[hnuser123456]

And from their own testimonials section:

> The good news (I realised) was that you can select all the text of the site, and then delete it. Problem solved.

[efilife]

I just read it here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ghuntley/noyaml/refs/heads...

[karczex]

This site is beautiful in it's own way.

[efilife]

Its. It's is a contraction of it+is