[os2warpman]

>There are plenty of sources in that article though?

There are no mentions of the fire department in that article except one in the last paragraph.

>“We’d love to talk to the fire and police departments and figure out a way to address safety concerns while keeping this corner a permanent fixture of the city,”

There are no other easily findable references on the internet.

All of this ignores the fact that the narrator of the video implied that the pedestrian mall was removed due to fire department interference, when it obviously wasn't and this conversation thread will not stray into any tangents and will focus on the fact that the narrator implied that the pedestrian mall was removed due to fire department interference, and that was a lie.