|
|
|
|
|
|
by gioazzi
432 days ago
|
|
|
I love the approach: keep the creative, human part intact - and in fact free up time for it, by letting AI take care of the menial tasks. And to all naysayers, yes, research is a menial task... if you think a True Writer[1] would always do it themselves on Google, keep in mind that just a few years ago a "true writer" would have to go scavenge in some abandoned archives to find reference material, so it's just a matter of perspective. We built UnitText[2] with the same idea in mind, although we started from the "proofreading/copy-editing" part. Arguably, that's something most don't do at all... but asking someone to read your content, give you feedback, and iterate on it is an extremely valuable part of the process. Having AI do it means you can do it almost for free, and often. Again, freeing up more time for the actual writing. Doesn't mean a human copy-editor shouldn't review your content before you hit publish, or a writer shouldn't read their references, but AI can help a lot with all those steps. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman [2]: https://unittext.com |
|
|