|
|
|
|
|
by rayiner
434 days ago
|
|
> No it isn't, productivity has to increase, that's why we constantly get rid of jobs that do not provide much value. Our measures of “value” are wrong. > I don't know what you are ranting about My point is that a lot of what we think of as “higher value” activities are actually derivative of and downstream of our industrial supremacy. As China takes up that mantle, the higher value activities will go along with it. E.g., how long do we expect the US to do the cutting edge nuclear power and weapons research when China is the one building all the nuclear power plants? I mean look at the path dependency that led to Silicon Valley. Why did the software revolution happen in the same place we were building the microchips? |
|
> Why did the software revolution happen in the same place we were building the microchips?
Hardware people becoming software people was extremely common back then, and still is today (EEs can make more coding than using their degree directly). Now we have the opposite problem (we don't have enough hardware people because software sucked all the oxygen out of the room) and China has less of it (although increasingly...they are repeating history as well). If anything, this just backs up my point in how higher value activities de-emphasize manufacturing (even super high end manufacturing as in semiconductors).
You can replace perceived value with actual value if you don't agree with the value judgement calls that were made, which is entirely reasonable.