|
|
|
|
|
by tfandango
430 days ago
|
|
We get to check a box on what AI we use when we close a ticket. I used to select "none" because most of the time that was the case, sometimes I would pick one if I used it to build some scaffolding or explore some performance issue. But then we started having AI demos with the CTO where the presenters would say things like "I don't know how to code in python but now I don't need to! yay!" and the C level people would be very excited about this. That's when I realized that these poor developers who just want to brown nose and show off to big cheese are instead making an argument for their own demise. Meanwhile I asked AI to make me a test and it mocked out everything I wanted to test, testing nothing, but passing. I wonder how much of these kinds of tests we have now... |
|
This sort of thing is what I'm most worried about with programmers who are very bullish on AI.
I don't think it's too controversial to say that most developers are much worse at reviewing code than they are at writing code
AI generated code is a code review exercise. If you accept my premise that most devs are worse at reviewing code than writing it, this should ring some alarm bells