|
|
|
|
|
by pydry
443 days ago
|
|
Maybe look at some data before FUDding. This model posits 97% carbon free generation in Australia with 5 hours of storage using actual real world weather data: https://reneweconomy.com.au/a-near-100-per-cent-renewables-g... >You can have many days or weeks Maybe cite actual data. >alternatives like gas peakers or perhaps nuclear. Nuclear isnt a peaker. Or rather, it can theoretically be used as a peaker but burning literal $100 notes may be more cost effective in the long run than using it as a peaker. Batteries and pumped storage are cost effective peakers. I find it's better when modeling renewable energy generation scenarios to try not to pretend they dont exist. |
|