[gs17]

> But if we slightly decrease the carbon footprint of a Hershey's bar, we'll be OK.

They're not saying it alone will fix it. They also say they:

>created the ChoViva website with an environmentally conscious mindset. This means we use fonts, colours, images and animations in a purposeful way, do without flashy videos and welcome you in the low-energy dark mode by default.

And I doubt you think they're claiming less JavaScript is all we need.

[prohobo]

So what is their claim then? They think that if you optimize your consumption based on "environmentally friendly" supply chains and aesthetics, even if those optimizations are actually unhealthy (ie. replacing cocoa with sunflower seeds) and/or useless, we'll solve climate change?

This is all about aesthetics for addicted consumers. What would actually be much better, all around, is if our culture started promoting buying high quality cocoa powder and making our own cookies instead of buying highly processed garbage that pretends to be good for the environment.

[gs17]

> we'll solve climate change

Things can help solve a problem without being sufficient to solve it on their own. Do you refuse to use LED lights because they won't bring your power bill down to zero?