|
|
|
|
|
by Borg3
440 days ago
|
|
Yeah.. and its annoying to read.. I always laught at people who try to make IDs with leading zeros. and then one day BOOM!! overflow. Its especially common in namings like: THING-01 THING-02.. we will never have more than 100 of them.. and then BOOM. I always say: leave it at fucking 1 and count up. Thats why we invented Natural Sorting to sort this out... |
|
[0] ZIP codes and phone numbers are important exceptions, but it's a non-issue if you always process these as strings, never as numbers, which is a reasonable constraint because we don't need to sort these numerically. Lexicographical sort is perfectly fine.
[1] The concept mentioned in footnote 0 does not really apply to SEMVER, because we do like to sort versions numerically. Lexicographical sort is wrong. But it's a group of dot-delimited integers, not to be conflated with floats, so while 7.100 comes before 7.2 when sorting floats, 7.100 comes after 7.2 when sorting SEMVER because the 2 and 100 are just integers.