|
|
|
|
|
by timr
441 days ago
|
|
> Indeed. That's especially true on the NATO side. This is a historical event on the scale of the breakup of the USSR. Exaggeration isn't helpful. Whatever "this" is, you can't possibly make an assessment of that kind until years after the fact. In March 2020, people were convincing themselves that the global economy was flying straight into the ground, but people who didn't lose their minds made a lot of money, quickly. IMO, there was a better case for that panic, given the context (they were partly right! the lockdown stuff was incredibly costly!), than there is that this particular spasm is meaningful. Only time will tell. |
|
I don't think you fully grasp the gravity of Trump's actions.
For the first time in its history, NATO is excluding the US from arms purchase programs. This takes place at a time where the EU is scrambling to prepare for a war with Russia, which is also caused by Trump's action of abandoning it's allies,
The Trump administration is also heavily invested in annexation rhetoric targeting multiple NATO members.
Then there's the whole tarrif absurdity.
These sequence of moronic steps individually represent world-changing events. They all took place in a couple of months into the Trump administration's takeover.
This goes well beyond the suspicion that Trump is a Russian stooge. This changes the way the world was structured after WW2. The fall of the soviet union might even have a smaller impact in world history.