|
|
|
|
|
by XorNot
440 days ago
|
|
The anti-establishment fervor of open source crypto developers is the reason this is a problem though. Most people, for most things, don't need to verify trust outside of normal government channels. i.e. any business I correspond with, trust is via the government that they are a business bound by the relevant legal system I live in. Same story with communicating with basically anyone: if their GPG key was signed by the common government key, then hey, good enough for anyone. The problem is...we don't have the infrastructure for any of this. And GPG key servers are inadequate for maintaining suitable privacy for people if they were used at this scale. But we certainly could provide the means by existing technologies: e.g. nothing stops us making drivers licenses and other forms of ID smart cards. |
|
Trusting the government as a peer makes sense for government sites, but for anything else, it just makes censorship way too easy.
Even among businesses, we normally trust the middleman (the credit card issuer, and their protections and chargebacks) over the government. If a business screws over a regular consumer, the government isn't really going to do anything.
Maybe you have a more civilized society and functional government where you live. We don't.