[Daedren]

Yes. It feels like the language is being handled by academics who don't actually use it, Swift 6 really drives it down.

The lack of Sendable support for Combine and half-assed support on Async Algorithms only makes it more painful to transition at this point in time.

[iamkonstantin]

It's now almost a full year since Swift 6 (concurrency) was introduced, and I've spent a lot of time rewriting, debugging and generally tweaking things to make the compiler happy... The promise of "strict concurrency" is yet to yield any meaningful benefit, despite the huge cost of having it.

I think the pursuit of some kind of semantic purity in the Swift language overshadows more practical needs and concerns. Making Swift too different from its neighbours like Kotlin and Rust also makes it harder to context switch. It now takes a lot more time and effort to get into the flow of developing native things for iOS...

[saagarjha]

Disagree about the academics point but Async Algorithms is basically an abandoned project at this point. There is someone working on it but the intention is that it evolves basically at the pace that the language does, but without the investment that the language gets. I would recommend against relying on anything going on there.

[Daedren]

Between a dead Combine that no longer functions in Swift 6 or a severely handicapped AsyncSequence lacking basic features, where are developers supposed to turn to?

All these projects like Async Algorithms, AsyncExtensions, Asynchrone, etc. are being born out of necessity.

Deprecating Combine would be less of a problem if Sendable wasn’t a hard requirement but it is.

[saagarjha]

I mostly write these things by hand when necessary which sucks but at least I know what is going on with them.

[elpakal]

Are you talking about Combine or Async Algorithms? This has been brought up before about Combine, but AA's repo still has some recent commits.

[saagarjha]

No, I'm talking about the latter. Combine is truly dead but the other repo is mired in an inability to make real changes, because that requires significant review effort, which is not really there. So it's just bugfixes and small tweaks.

[DidYaWipe]

Let's not forget the absurd insistence on "will change" semantics in onChange() instead of the far-more-useful notification "did change."

And of course the brain-dead design of withObservationTracking, which only fires on the FIRST change of a value. I mean... by what definition is that "tracking?" It's goddamned useless, unless of course you implement the clumsy workaround of re-establishing observation tracking every (first) time it fires.

Then there's the bizarre hypocrisy of evangelizing the "single source of truth" while telling everyone to prefer structs over classes in Swift. But structs are COPIED everywhere, which of course breaks the "single source of truth" on the first function call.

I wasted so much time trying to conform to these "best practices" until I finally realized that the people promoting them don't know WTF they're doing. Then I went back to classes, injected the "single source" everywhere it was needed, and got to work adding functionality.

And let's not even get into the half-assery that is SwiftUI... still, all these years later.