Honest question, do you think this will lead to more work for “hands-on” programmers to fix errors, or this could just be the early stages of agenic coding becoming better and more akin to the best (or close to it) “hands-on” programmer?
Market forces will drive the outcomes in different sectors.
In aviation-minded companies, human-reviewed guardrails will always be in place, some may eventually decide to might as well have humans write the whole thing to begin with to keep it end-to-end auditable.
In automotive-minded companies, "chabuduo" is the norm and agentic may be "good enough if it appears to work" and only involve humans when visible crises surface, in which case the most desired programmer are those who can churn.
Or a different outcome