|
|
|
|
|
by blacksqr
434 days ago
|
|
I don't understand the point of this article. Was she not working in the US in exchange for accommodation? It certainly seems she was. Was she not violating US visa rules by doing so? IANAL but it seems plausible she was. Why did she sign her statement if it was inaccurate? I seem to see a lot of stories of people getting in legal trouble that boil down to 'I signed an inaccurate statement because I thought that would make it all go away.' Is this supposed to be an argument worthy of sympathy? Is there a reason to see this story as something other than someone was unable to exercise white privilege to avoid consequences for bending (breaking) the rules? |
|