|
|
|
|
|
|
by b0bben
434 days ago
|
|
|
thx for the kind words! to your (awesome) questions:
right now it's centrally managed. it's just easier to build this way and use existing services. i use own apis, firebase and livekit. at some point i'd LOVE to work on this full-time and live off of it, that's my end-goal. everything is doable, but it would/will take work, but i wouldn't mind creating a self-hosted version for the 4 of you that really really want that ;) |
|
|
Yeah, totally makes sense, centralized is easier. no hamr, no foul. :-)
> ...i'd LOVE to work on this full-time and live off of it, that's my end-goal.
Well, if/when you launch this, I'd be interested in paying you to manage the hosting of it. so, you jhave at least 1 willing potential customer!
> ... i wouldn't mind creating a self-hosted version...
Remember, how i want a self-hosted option? That still is true...but i likely would prefer to pay YOU to manage the hosting. In other words, I gladly pay devs/teams/orgs to manage hosted apps for me...but I always LIKE that they offer me a choicee to self-host something if/whenever I choose. Basically, if a company gives me the opportunity to leave them at any time...that in a way earns my trust, and that helps me want to pay them for their service...assuming their service is reliable, well-managed of course. So, yeah, self-hosted is the gold standard to live up to...but, don;t get it twisted: if you build in self-hosting AS WELL AS offer paid plans, i will def. pay you! Remember that, because there are TONS of people like me, who on principle want open source, self-hosted options, but who will gladly PAY for someone to manage said open source apps/services.
Again, cheers and kudos!