|
|
|
|
|
|
by FinnLobsien
445 days ago
|
|
|
They are for profit, they're just a "public benefit corporation". I don't know exactly what that means and I don't think it comes with any obligations (like being a non-profit would). It's the same status Patagonia has. I think it's more of a signal to investors (we won't maximize your gains) and a brand boost with the community. |
|
|